[T]he moral point of the matter is never reached by calling what happened by the name of ‘genocide’ or by counting the many millions of victims: extermination of whole peoples had happened before in antiquity, as well as in modern colonization. It is reached only when we realize this happened within the frame of a legal order and that the cornerstone of this ‘new law’ consisted of the command ‘Thou shall kill,’ not thy enemy but innocent people who were not even potentially dangerous, and not for any reason of necessity but, on the contrary, even against all military and other utilitarian calculations. … And these deeds were not committed by outlaws, monsters, or raving sadists, but by the most respected members of respectable society.
The State proved that Thomson corruptly offered (the offer having been communicated to Shaik)
to give a benefit
which was not legally due
to a person, being Zuma,
who had been charged with duties, being the duties set out in s 96(2) of the Constitution
by virtue of the holding of the office of Deputy President of the RSA
with the intention to influence him
to commit or to do an act in relation to such duty. – SCA judgment in S v Shaik